<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <title>The Longer Look</title>
  <subtitle>For questions public debate treats too quickly.</subtitle>
  <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/feed.xml" rel="self"/>
  <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/"/>
  <id>https://thelongerlook.com/</id>
  <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
  <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
  <rights>© Doug Scott 2026 · Licensed under Creative Commons BY-NC 4.0</rights>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration in May 2026 — A Reference</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-overview.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-overview.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A reference on UK migration and benefits policy as of May 2026. Net migration has fallen sharply, lifetime fiscal contribution varies sharply by route, asylum accommodation procurement is the largest documented cost overrun, voluntary returns are eleven times cheaper than enforced. The publication does not advocate a single policy direction; it lays out the evidence, the available policy options, what each major political party would do, and seven parallel framings — cohesion, protection, demographic, AI labour market, capacity, emigration, and sovereignty — that select and weight the same evidence differently.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Reference for Journalists</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-for-journalists.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-for-journalists.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>For journalists and commentators. The combined pack: front matter, the data foundation, the comparative party analysis, and the framing articles most relevant to political coverage of migration policy. Approximately 22,000 words.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Reference for Policymakers</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-for-policymakers.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-for-policymakers.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>For civil servants, policy advisers, ministers, and opposition staff. The combined pack: front matter, the options menu (twenty policy options across the spectrum), the master comparative analysis of party positions, and the framings and stakeholder perspectives most relevant to policy formation. Approximately 21,000 words.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Reference for the Engaged Public</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-for-the-public.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-for-the-public.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>For engaged citizens, voters, and community leaders. The combined pack: front matter, the seven framings, and the standalone deep-dives on the topics most contested in public debate (the 2022-2024 ILR cohort, housing, crime and trust). Approximately 17,500 words.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — Party Proposals: Costed Implications</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-proposals-costed.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-proposals-costed.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A comparable, costed cross-party analysis of UK migration proposals as of May 2026. For each of the nine parties: stated proposals, proposal-by-proposal cost ranges, savings/revenue ranges, net fiscal effect (with HIGH/MEDIUM/LOW confidence labels), implications from inside the party&apos;s worldview AND from external analytical perspective, deliverability constraints, legal exposure, and likely behavioural responses. A comparative summary table at the end across all nine parties. Approximately 25,000-30,000 words. The companion to the nine party briefings, written from outside each worldview rather than from inside it.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The Cohesion Frame</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-cohesion-frame.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-cohesion-frame.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of seven companion framings to the master document, applying the same evidence base from a community-cohesion perspective. Pace of change matters more than scale; integration outcomes vary by route; residential concentration creates parallel lives; English language is a genuine cohesion variable; the political backlash is itself a cohesion variable. The framing is presented at full strength, with the cases against it acknowledged openly.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The Protection Frame</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-protection-frame.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-protection-frame.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of seven companion framings to the master document, applying the same evidence base from a refugee-protection perspective. Grant rates from current high-volume small-boat-arrival nationalities are mostly very high (Sudan 96%, Eritrea 88%); the protection frame asks what the evidence implies if international protection obligations are taken as the starting point rather than as a constraint. Presented at full strength.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The Demographic Frame</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-demographic-frame.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-demographic-frame.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of seven companion framings to the master document, applying the same evidence base from a demographic-sustainability perspective. Population structure, dependency ratios, OBR sustainability modelling, and what the demographic frame implies for migration policy at scale. Presented at full strength, including where it cuts against restrictionist intuitions and where it cuts against expansionist intuitions.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The AI Labour-Market Frame</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-ai-frame.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-ai-frame.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of seven companion framings, the most rapidly evolving evidence base in the document. AI is currently displacing high-paid white-collar work faster than low-paid migrant-dependent sectors. The King&apos;s College London October 2025 study found firms with high AI exposure cut total employment 4.5% and junior positions 5.8% (2021-2025). The AI frame complicates restrictionist assumptions about automation replacing migrant labour and supports adaptive sectoral planning. Presented at full strength.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The Public-Service Capacity Frame</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-capacity-frame.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-capacity-frame.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of seven companion framings, applying the same evidence base from a public-service-capacity perspective. School places, GP registrations, social housing, and local-government finances. The capacity frame is concerned with absorption rate at the level of individual local authorities, not with national totals; it produces different policy weightings from any frame that operates only at national scale.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The Emigration Frame</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-emigration-frame.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-emigration-frame.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of seven companion framings, applying the same evidence base from a British-citizen-outflow perspective. Net migration is inflows minus outflows; the emigration frame asks what is happening to the outflow side, who is leaving the UK, what their fiscal contribution profile looks like, and what the implications are for net contribution and skills retention. The frame is under-discussed in the public debate and produces distinctive policy weightings.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The Sovereignty Frame</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-sovereignty-frame.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-sovereignty-frame.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of seven companion framings, applying the same evidence base from a post-Brexit sovereignty perspective. The sovereignty frame asks not whether the UK can control its borders but what controlling them is being used for, what international commitments constrain it, and what trade-offs are visible only when sovereignty is the priority lens. Presented at full strength, including the cases for and against ECHR withdrawal.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for Labour</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-labour.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-labour.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside Labour&apos;s worldview to make the strongest version of Labour&apos;s case on migration. Where the evidence reinforces the direction Labour is travelling; where the evidence requires sharpening; the political coalition the position has to hold; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for the Conservatives</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-conservative.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-conservative.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside the Conservatives&apos; worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration after the 2022-2024 surge. Where the evidence reinforces; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for the Liberal Democrats</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-libdems.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-libdems.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside the Liberal Democrats&apos; worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration. Where the evidence reinforces; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for the Green Party</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-green.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-green.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside the Green Party&apos;s worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration. Where the evidence reinforces; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for Reform UK</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-reform-uk.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-reform-uk.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside Reform UK&apos;s worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration. Where the evidence reinforces the direction; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for Restore Britain</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-restore-britain.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-restore-britain.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside Restore Britain&apos;s worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration. Where the evidence reinforces the direction; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for the SNP</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-snp.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-snp.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside the SNP&apos;s worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration as it concerns Scotland. Where the evidence reinforces; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for Plaid Cymru</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-plaid-cymru.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-plaid-cymru.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside Plaid Cymru&apos;s worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration as it concerns Wales. Where the evidence reinforces; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for the DUP</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-dup.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-party-dup.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of nine party briefings, written from inside the DUP&apos;s worldview to make the strongest version of their case on migration as it concerns Northern Ireland. Where the evidence reinforces; where it requires sharpening; the political coalition; three things to do in the next twelve months.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — The 2022-2024 ILR Cohort</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-the-boriswave.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-the-boriswave.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A standalone analysis of the 2022-2024 net-migration peak (&quot;Boriswave&quot; in informal political usage). The cohort that arrived during the 2022-2024 net migration peak (906,000 in 2023) is now reaching the five-year settlement window, which is the source of much of the political pressure on settlement-rule reform. The piece walks the cohort, the route mix, what the evidence says about their fiscal trajectories, and the policy options the master document&apos;s options menu attaches to this question.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — Housing Supply</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-housing.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-housing.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A standalone analysis of the relationship between migration and the UK housing crisis. What the data does show about migration&apos;s contribution to housing pressure, what it does not, who actually receives social housing, what the public-opinion data shows about the salience-accuracy gap, and what the evidence implies for housing policy.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — Crime, Trust, and the Debate</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-crime-and-trust.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-crime-and-trust.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A standalone, careful treatment of the topic at the centre of trust collapse in UK migration policy. Confidence labels (high / medium / low) at every claim level. The foundational data gap, what data does exist, the Albanian signal as the strongest finding in the data, the geographic correlation, the grooming gang question, the suppression question, and what the evidence-graded conclusions actually support. Long, deliberate, and uncomfortable in places.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for Business and Employer Bodies</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-business.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-business.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of four stakeholder briefings, written from inside the employer perspective on UK migration policy. The position business interests typically hold across the political spectrum: workforce, skills, productivity, operational continuity, sectoral planning. Where the employer position converges with worker representation (training, predictability, opposition to crude caps) and where it diverges sharply (tied visas, sectoral bargaining, wage compression).</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for Trade Unions and Worker Representation</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-unions.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-unions.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of four stakeholder briefings, written from inside the trade-union perspective on UK migration policy. The position worker representation typically holds: wage compression, displacement risk, tied-visa exploitation, sectoral bargaining, training investment. The companion piece to the business briefing on questions where union and employer positions converge and where they diverge.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for the Senior Civil Service</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-civil-service.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-civil-service.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of four stakeholder briefings, written from inside the operational perspective of the senior civil service on UK migration policy. What the data implies for delivery; where the implementation pinch-points are; what ministerial decisions actually require operationally; what is feasible inside Parliament, inside HMG legal exposure, and inside HMRC, Home Office, and DWP capacity constraints. Not a political position; an operational one.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>UK Migration — A Briefing for Metro Mayors and Local Government</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-local-government.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-10-uk-migration-stakeholder-local-government.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-10T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>One of four stakeholder briefings, written from inside the local-government perspective on UK migration policy. Metro Mayors, Combined Authorities, Council Leaders. Where central-government decisions create local cost-shifting (NRPF, asylum dispersal, school-place pressure); where local capacity is real and where it is overstated; what local government actually needs to absorb migration well; where the political coalition for that need exists.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Position F — A Founder Election with a Decade Cap</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-position-f-founder-election.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-position-f-founder-election.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A sixth position on the timing-and-mechanism question. The estate elects, at death, between settlement at death under the existing reform (Regime 1) and a deferred-realisation regime with a hard ten-year backstop (Regime 2). The taxable transfer remains the death event; Position F changes the collection mechanism and timing, not the underlying tax principle. Drafted as the bounded version of Position B — the version that survives the case-against-B in the publication&apos;s timing piece. Originally circulated as Position E; relabelled F because the publication already uses Position E for the reform-as-written reference case.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Position F — The Five-Minute Version</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-position-f-overview.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-position-f-overview.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A short overview of Position F: a per-company estate election at death between settlement under the existing reform and a deferred-realisation regime capped at ten years. The proposal in five minutes, with the case for, the case against, and how it sits alongside the publication&apos;s existing design positions. The full long-form treatment is linked at the end.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Should We Build Mars? — A Public Brief</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-public-brief.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-public-brief.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Document 5 of the Building Mars set. A thirty-minute brief for general readers. What is being proposed for Mars, what the strongest arguments for and against the project are, and why people who have thought carefully reach different conclusions. The brief does not tell you what to think; it tries to give you the considerations clearly enough that you can decide for yourself.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mars Industrialisation — Investor Memo</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-investor-memo.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-investor-memo.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Document 1 of the Building Mars set. A decision memo for capital allocators evaluating whether to deploy investment into the operating entity, the supply chain, or adjacent infrastructure. Assumes the reader is making a deployment decision, not weighing whether the project should happen at all. Readers concerned with the latter question are pointed to Documents 4 and 6.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mars Industrialisation — Policy White Paper</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-policy-paper.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-policy-paper.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Document 2 of the Building Mars set. The regulatory and international framework. Written for policymakers, regulators, and international affairs analysts who must take positions on specific questions. Identifies what is decision-forcing and what is not, the positions that exist on each, and the regulatory and international choices implicit in supporting different paths forward.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mars Industrialisation — Technical Reference</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-technical.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-technical.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Document 3 of the Building Mars set. Engineering architecture, the eight specific compression moves that take the timeline from a 50-year baseline to roughly 25 years, the phased plan, the hard problems including the semiconductor wall, and the technical risk register. For engineers, technical analysts, and informed technical readers. Hedged where the technical claims are contested.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mars Industrialisation — The Case Against</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-case-against.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-case-against.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Document 4 of the Building Mars set. The strongest version of the case against large-scale Mars industrialisation as currently conceived, written as critique rather than balanced analysis. The case against does not depend on the project failing technically; it is largely the case against the project being undertaken even on the assumption it would succeed. For readers who want the structural critique articulated in its fullest form.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mars Industrialisation — Ethical and Philosophical Analysis</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-ethical-analysis.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-ethical-analysis.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Document 6 of the Building Mars set. Questions that cannot be resolved by engineering. The moral standing of indigenous Mars life, the ethics of planetary alteration, the longtermist framework and its critics, governance and consent in closed habitats, intergenerational obligations, and the deepest question — whether humans have the appropriate authority to industrialise other worlds at all. Positions presented seriously rather than reduced to slogans.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Mars Industrialisation — Reference Materials</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-reference.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-09-mars-reference.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-09T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Document 7 of the Building Mars set. The reference appendix. Full assumptions ledger, target company list with funding status and acquisition rationale, capital sources and investor map, citations with balanced further reading from supporters, critics, and skeptics. The verification anchor for facts cited across Documents 1 through 6.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The train</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/the-train.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/the-train.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-08T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-08T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A piece from the notebook. About the difference between the people who moan about the destination and the people who keep the engine going. About the driver who does not know where the train is going. About the three kinds of shoveller, and the friendship that is the actual work. About knowing your chair, and getting better at sitting in it. May or may not be connected to the rest of the publication.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Team Around the Founder — what the IHT reform does to co-founders, early employees, and vested equity holders</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-06-the-team-around-the-founder.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-06-the-team-around-the-founder.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-06T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Public coverage of the April 2026 reform has focused on the lead founder. A growing technology company is not one founder. The reform sits across a team — co-founders with material stakes, early employees whose vested options compounded across rounds, senior operators with later-stage grants. This piece walks the population the existing pieces have not directly addressed, evaluates the planning levers as they actually apply to that population, and frames the recruiting and retention question this creates for UK technology companies.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Race Against Itself — UK fiscal arithmetic, the productivity rescue, and the cohort the country is signalling its willingness to lose</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-06-the-race-against-itself.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-06-the-race-against-itself.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-06T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-06T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Cross-category piece. The UK s fiscal arithmetic, on most institutional projections, cannot be closed by tax rises or spending cuts alone. The remaining lever is productivity growth. On current evidence, productivity at the scale required runs heavily through a small and globally mobile cohort AI researchers, deep-tech founders, life-sciences scientists, the engineers and operators around them. The country s policy responses to its fiscal pressure are signalling to that cohort that they should leave. The race is between the productivity rescue arriving in time and the cohort departing fast enough to ensure it does not. Diagnosis presented at full strength. Four counter-positions presented at full strength. The publication s residual lean named.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>VC: most fail, most suffer, some win lots — does society win or lose?</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-society-win-or-lose.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-society-win-or-lose.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>An open question on venture capital. Seven analytical frames in parallel, evidence labelled by strength, anchored in US/UK/EU as a natural experiment. A short prologue addresses the reader directly: the entire messaging environment around venture capital is engineered to make you, specifically, believe you will be the winner. The frames evaluate the system. Evaluating yourself is a different exercise the document cannot do for you.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>From talent to transaction — twenty years inside an accelerator program</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-talent-to-transaction.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-talent-to-transaction.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>The predecessor synthesis on accelerators, useful for readers interested in how accelerators relate to the broader venture-capital ecosystem. Treats acceptance into an accelerator as a structural moment that reshapes a founder&apos;s twenty-year arc — the cap table becomes a moral document, mentorship becomes entangled with deal flow, failure is metabolised as portfolio churn, the grammar of relationships changes. Person-by-person ramifications across founders, employees, capital, infrastructure, and the public.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The 33%</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/the-33-percent.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/the-33-percent.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Cooper, Woo and Dunkelberg surveyed 2,994 entrepreneurs in 1988. Thirty-three percent rated their probability of success at one hundred percent. They were not failing at probability theory. They were correctly registering the signal of the messaging environment they were immersed in. This piece is what that means.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Why Fund Economics Need Overconfident Founders</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/why-fund-economics-need-overconfident-founders.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/why-fund-economics-need-overconfident-founders.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>A typical early-stage venture fund makes about twenty-five investments. Its returns to limited partners depend almost entirely on whether one or two turned out to be extreme outliers. What that math forces, in three steps, is the part this piece is about.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>What the Natural Experiment Shows</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/what-the-natural-experiment-shows.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/what-the-natural-experiment-shows.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>The US, UK, and EU run variants of the same venture model under different conditions. Comparing the three lets us ask which features of the system are intrinsic to running a venture model at all, and which are local-design choices that could be different. The line between the two changes what reform is possible.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Both Halves of the Headline Are True</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/both-halves-are-true.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/both-halves-are-true.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Venture capital is good for society and bad for most founders. Readers who hear that sentence often assume one of the two halves must be wrong. Both are documented in the empirical literature. The trick of holding them at the same time is the work the longer pieces do; this piece is the door.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Venture Capital Is Good for Society and Bad for Most Founders</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-good-for-society-bad-for-founders.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-good-for-society-bad-for-founders.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Venture capital is good for society and bad for most founders. Both halves are documented in the empirical literature. Most writing about VC handles one half or the other; this piece handles both.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>The Wrong Winners Write the Books</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/the-wrong-winners-write-the-books.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/the-wrong-winners-write-the-books.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Founder advice is not only survivor-biased. It is filtered toward the survivors most certain that their outcome was repeatable. The classic survivorship filter is well known: failures do not write the books. Two further filters operate on the survivor cohort itself — and they are what give the recruitment narrative its tone before any individual VC, accelerator, or founder-coach does anything. This piece names all three.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>Common Reactions — VC: substantive critiques and the publication&apos;s responses</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-common-reactions.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-common-reactions.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-05T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>Six substantive critiques the publication has received on the venture-capital pieces. Where the critique is right, the publication agrees. Where the deep version already treats the point, the publication says so. Where the publication thinks the critique misreads what the pieces are doing, the publication pushes back.</summary>
  </entry>
  <entry>
    <title>For Prospective Founders — What the Recruitment Narrative Does Not Say</title>
    <link href="https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-for-prospective-founders.html"/>
    <id>https://thelongerlook.com/articles/2026-05-05-vc-for-prospective-founders.html</id>
    <updated>2026-05-04T00:00:00Z</updated>
    <published>2026-05-04T00:00:00Z</published>
    <author><name>Doug Scott</name></author>
    <summary>For a reader weighing whether to enter the venture system as a founder, an early employee, or an investor of personal savings into venture funds. The strongest single argument the publication has on this topic, made as its own piece because it deserves to. With primary sources you can verify.</summary>
  </entry>
</feed>